Half-Assed in Haggledom
Economic Laws for the Real World
June 9, 2007
Why are Third-World countries poor, while those in the First World aren’t? (The phrase “third world” is a tad shaky, embracing as it seems to Taiwan, Thailand, and Mexico, and also Haiti and Zaire. We will use it for convenience.)
The standard explanation in the Third World is that the West, chiefly the United States, exploits them, buying their raw materials and selling them manufactured goods. Everything is someone else’s fault. The reasons I think are otherwise. The advanced nations will exploit anyone they can, but this hasn’t kept Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, Argentina, and many other countries from prospering.
Start with corruption. In many poor countries, virtually everything is for sale. You can bribe the cops to get out of a ticket or bribe them to beat up an enemy, bribe a general in the army to overlook illegal logging, bribe anybody to do anything. The result is that really the country barely has laws, which means that you can never be sure of your legal ground. Businesses need predictability.
Corruption exists in advanced countries, but there is less of it, and it tends to take organized form, as in campaign contributions, affirmative action, and seats of boards of directors after leaving office.
Suspected Economic Law: The easier it is to bribe a working-stiff cop, the poorer the country.
Sheer governmental inefficiency has much to do with it. When I was in Taiwan many years ago, when the country was first developing, I talked to an American businessman about Asia. Taiwan, he said, had Enterprise Zones, fenced regions with buildings and utilities in place. You signed one document, brought in your machinery, hired workers, and started production.
In Thailand, he said (it may no longer be true) you had to negotiate for months with the Interior Ministry to get land, then months with the Labor Ministry, then months, then months, meanwhile bribing everybody right and left. I’ve got the names of the ministries wrong, but you get the point.
Suspected Economic Law: Prosperity varies inversely with the time between beginning negotiations to open a factory and getting first product.
While inefficient government retards economic progress, it doesn’t follow that countries with inefficient governments will always be poor. Industry in the United States has been so productive that, although the government is worse than useless, the country can withstand it.
A serious obstacle to prosperity is Half-Assedness, a quality not widely recognized in econometrics but well known to experienced travelers. Half-Assedness is a curious mixture of just not giving a damn, lack of ambition, little interest in academics, and sometimes something that looks like lethargy.
You go into houses and never see books. A man will start a garage to repair cars for a living. He won’t think of expanding and owning a chain of garages. His family has enough to eat, so why do more? The young, though they could pursue school beyond some pre-high school level, don’t. They marry early instead of establishing themselves first. People can't drive well. They live in the present, whereas people in rich countries have one foot in the future. An American thinks college, grad school, career. He is going somewhere, or trying to. He may not adhere to his plan, but he has one.
An element of Half-Assedness is a slack attitude toward maintenance. People who could easily afford nineteen cents for a brake-light bulb don’t. They throw trash in the streets. Potholes go unprepared for years.
Suspected Economic Law: National income is inversely proportional to the amount of trash in the streets.
Another aspect of Half-Assedness is an incapacity to attach importance to time. This comes in two flavors, wholesale and retail. At the wholesale level, an American thinks, “Oh my god, I’m thirty and haven't made partner.” A Third-Worlder lacks any sense of urgency. He sees existence as a period through which one passes instead of an interval in which one does things.
At time’s retail level, Third-Worlder’s think that four o’clock means anywhere from five-thirty to not at all. It isn’t rudeness or inconsideration. If you do it to them, they won’t be offended. By contrast, an American reporter, say, knows that if his nine-o’clock interview happens at nine, the one at eleven will be possible, and the business lunch will come off on time, so that he can hit the computer by three and file at five. It works. Americans show up ten minutes early and wait. In the Third World, writing the same story would take three days instead of one.
Suspected Economic law: Per capita income correlates with the average number of minutes by which people miss appointments.
In the Third World there is a different attitude to commerce. An American businessman is likely to give a new client a good price, or at least the going price, in hopes of acquiring him as a regular customer. If in the Third World a European gets a haircut without asking the price, he will be charged eight dollars when the correct price is four dollars. He will never come back.
This is normal third-world economics—gouge the customer to the max without thought of the future. The practice is encouraged by the reliance on haggling in poor countries. I have sometimes wondered whether this doesn’t make tricking the customer more important than having a good product.
Suspected Economic Law: Countries that bargain have less money than those that don’t.
The what-me-care attitude can be, to an American, incomprehensible. You want a roof job that would cost several thousand dollars, a lot of money in many countries. The workmen promise to come the next day to give you an estimate. They don’t show. You call, and they say, well, my car broke. Next day, same thing. They got to your town but couldn’t find the house. And so on. So you go to Wal-Mart or Home Depot or some similar First-World enterprise and get the job done.
Another element of Half-Assedness is, depending on your politics, cultural or inherent, but unmistakable. Some populations just aren’t very bright, or at any rate don’t seem to be. Sub-Saharan Africa, though rich in resources, is pea-turkey poor and not improving. Arab countries, even when awash in oil money, do not establish First World societies that could survive without oil. In South America the white countries, such as Chile and Argentina, could be in Europe. The highly Indian countries, as for example Bolivia and Peru, would be basket cases if they could afford the basket.
Suspected Economic Law: The more European or East Asian blood, the more money.
That’s Fred on economics. Lynch mobs may take a number.
Recenly I wrote of encountering an unpleasant gal pilot on Continental. I got a couple of emails from others with similar experience with her.. One in particular I thought interesting. Here it is.
> Your column about the female Continental pilot certainly rang my bell. I had the same pilot on Monday, May 21, when I returned from Houston to Guadalajara. I am going to safely assume that it was the same pilot. After all, how many female pilots could Continental have flying CO2099, an Embraer, at 2:20PM from Houston to Guadalajara?
> On my flight, she did not berate the passengers. However, when I was boarding I heard her talking to the male co-pilot as if he were a six- year-old who had just pissed his pants. While on the tarmac waiting in line, she made some announcement with the introduction: "I am the pilot" ... with a tone of voice that implied, "... and if anybody fucks with me, or contradicts my orders, or interferes with my command of this plane, then there will be hell to pay until everybody on board understands that I'm in charge."
> It was so bizarre that I made a mental note to call or write Continental to let somebody know that there may be a pilot whose medication needs an adjustment. But, like you, I later told myself that such a letter would do nothing more than generate a boilerplate response.
> I try to be a modern and tolerant old fart, but the fact is that my personal safety radar hits the peg when there is a female pilot. Several years ago, I happened to notice a possible trend about the gender of those involved in several major air tragedies. The pilot of the plane that crashed in New Jersey shortly after 9/11 was female. The air controller guiding the planes in that Mexicana accident at LAX was female. The pilot of that plane that buried itself in a Florida swamp was female. The pilot of a commuter plane that crashed for no apparent reason in North Carolina was female. And, several more.
> So, I tried to connect the dots. I was living in France at the time, and one day I was tired of sidewalk cafes and naked ladies on the beach. I made a list of a dozen US air crashes, and I started phoning (on my cheapo Skype account) the airlines, NTSB, FAA and anybody else I could think of. In each call, I explained that I did not need the name, but I wanted to know the gender of key people involved in each crash.
> My phone calls were transferred to various "public information officers" and "public affairs specialists", almost all of whom were female because that's one profession that has been taken over by women in the past couple of decades. I asked my question.
> "Why do you want to know that?" was the response in a bitchy, accusing, nasal voice. (Why do most younger American women sound like they're talking through a Kazoo?) I never got an answer to my question, and I lost my interest. I was just pissing into the wind, anyhow. But, I'm sure that because there are so few female commercial pilots and air controllers that one or two airline crashes could skew the statistics.
However, I remain convinced that it is a valid question as to whether females
as pilots or air controllers are a higher risk than their male colleagues.
> When you are unpacked, how about a beer?