COP Columns

 

 

 

 

The Blacks Killed In Cincinnati

Are The Media Actualy Trying To Start Riots?

 

Since the looting and burning in Cincinnati, the mainstream media have mentioned over and over the fifteen black men killed by police in the city in recent years. The implication, never so far as I know buttressed with data, has been that the police were unjustified, that they kill blacks for reasons of racism.

The media don't say this explicitly. Explicit assertions can be checked. The results would be embarrassing. But you don't have to be explicit, just selective in what you let people know. Merely by mentioning with mournful solemnity "the fifteen black men who died at the hands of police," you ensure that the many people, if not most, will draw the desired conclusions.

Now, if I were black, fifteen unjustified killings would make me more than angry. In fact, being white, they would make me angry. I doubt that anyone except a lunatic fringe wants innocents shot. But is this what happened?

No.

The Internet increasingly is the primary journal for intelligent people who want to know when the major media are lying. The big papers and television may not have figured this out yet. On the Net I found a story about the fifteen blacks killed in Cincinnati -- specifically a story in the Cincinnati Enquirer, by Dan Klepal and Cindi Andrews. Let me give a few examples of what they found about the black men who were killed, and why they were shot.

(1) "Daniel Williams flagged down Kathleen Conway's police cruiser on February 2, 1998. When she stopped, he hit her in the face and fired four shots from a .357 Magnum into her legs and abdomen before seizing the steering wheel and shoving her into the passenger seat. Officer Conway, 23, survived the attack by shooting Mr. Williams in the head with two shots from her service revolver."

Now, does this perhaps put a different perspective on this particular shooting? I think most of us would agree that if you jump into a cop's car and shoot her four times, you don't have the moral high ground in complaining about being shot in return. If a white guy similarly jumped a black cop, who shot him, I'd buy the cop a beer.

Further, I seriously doubt that blacks think that a woman, just having been shot several times, should not defend herself. But you didn't see the foregoing account on the networks, did you?

(2) In 1995, a guy named Harvey Price murdered a girl of fifteen with multiple blows from an axe, and dragged her body to the basement. Someone called the police. He eventually was found in a bathroom, with a knife. The cops used pepper spray and stun guns to try to subdue him. Both of these, I note, are nonlethal: They weren't trying to kill him. He came at them with the knife, and they shot him.

Now, I don't think that blacks would deny a cop the right to defend himself against an axe murderer attacking with a knife. Certainly I don't, and I don't care who is what color. But I'll bet not one black, or white, in ten thousand knows the foregoing.

Most of the killings are similar. In at least one case the man was shooting at the police, who returned fire. A couple of cases are less clear. They do not remotely constitute a list of unjustified racist killings. But, weirdly, the media don't want you to know this.

Does that seem a paranoid overstatement? Fred has gone off the deep end? Reflect.

Reporters are not stupid. Neither are editors. I promise they can think of obvious questions: What color were the cops who shot? Were the shootings justified? What were the circumstances? All shootings are investigated. There is a paper trail. Journalists know it.

But there are some stories you just aren't supposed to write. We all know that too.

Now, what does this do for race relations?

What do you think? If you tell blacks over and over, usually by innuendo or carefully deceptive editing, that cops are murdering blacks, they're going to be very angry. Who wouldn't be? The ghetto, already explosive, will become more so. Either more and worse riots will come, or -- as is happening -- the cops will ignore crime because it's safer not to get involved. Crime will then rise, the quality of life for blacks will fall, and the police will be blamed in the media for not providing service.

Sometimes I'm not real impressed with my trade.
Fred On Everything

 

 


 

Buy Fred's New Collection of Sedition and Outrage!

Curmudgeing Through Paradise

What the critics are saying

"Despicable. Without redeeming features": New York Preview of Books "Fred be discriminate!": Al Sharpton "Fred--that ugh! man--is the ideological equivalent of the Hillside Strangler": The American Feminist "Fred deserves his own entry in the DSM V": Psychology Today


Note: If emailing, do not remove the slashes that appear in the subject line as otherwise, to avoid spam, your email will be heartlessly auto-deleted.

Donate Email Fred

Other Note: I try to read all letters, but simply cannot respond to hundreds of emails. Neither rudeness nor delusional self-importance is involved. Just can't do it. My apologies.

Google
Web FOE

See? You are not alone.

Hit Counter

Which may or may not be a good thing. At any rate, there are other twisted, brain-fried wackos out there who have too much time on their hands and read this stuff, probably while cleaning their guns. But don't worry. This site wraps its IP packets in plain brown envelopes marked "Kinky Books" so your neighbors won't know. Anyway, to the extent that counters mean any thing, which isn't much of an extent, this sucker gives the number of columns read, not counting subscribers, since Monday, October 8, 2002. Whoopee-do. More or less.



Nekkid in Austin

Buy Fred's new reprehensible book, Nekkid In Austin! Barnes and Noble has the beast. Another collection of outrages, irresponsible ravings, and curmudgeonry from Fred On Everything and some innocent magazines that foolishly published him. Put Fred Reed in the search at thingy at B&N and the book will pop up like mushrooms on a decaying stump. Tell everyone you came to the site by mistake while searching for articles on cannibalism. Your childhood made you do it. We're all victims nowadays.

Buy Fred's Book!


The Great Possum-Squashing
and Beer Storm of 1962

Stock up. Christmas will eventually come again, if it isn't outlawed. Possum-Squashing is a better present than an ugly tie. At least as good anyway.

Buy Fred's Book!


Terms of Use | | About Fred | Subscribe | Unsubscribe

©Fred Reed
www.FredOnEverything.net

Site designed by Emily Wolfer
edesign@healthyspiritllc.com