COP Columns

The Diallo Shooting

Inventing Racial Motives

Regarding the shooting of Amadou Diallo:

Presumably everyone on earth knows that the guy, black, was shot 19 times by white cops in New York who said they thought a wallet he reached for was a gun. If you didn't know, I admire your restraint in subjecting yourself to the media. The cops were just acquitted by a jury containing four blacks. The coverage of the story has labored the idea that the shooting was racial in character, that evil white cops shot a black man because he was black. This notion was never explicitly stated, probably because then someone might have asked what support there was for it, but it was palpable.

I don't know enough about the case to comment on its merits. A few thoughts on this kind of case:

Cops are not fools. They are acutely aware that every move they make will be scrutinzed for racial motives, real or, in many cases, imaginary. They have seen all the cases on television.

It is therefore extremely unlikely that they got together over a beer one day and said, "Hey! I got it! Let's go riddle some innocent black guy, lose our jobs and mortgages, and get maybe ten years in the slam, with other black guys who won't like us at all. Would that be a hoot, or what?"

Not plausible. If you told me that racist cops were beating black drug dealers in alleys, the charge might or might not be true, but it would be plausible: Such cops could reasonably expect not to get caught. But the idea of a hunting pack going after blacks to shoot them makes no sense on its face.

Now, might cops--black or white--be a bit quicker to shoot a black apparently reaching for a gun than they would a white? Yes and no. A white woman in an evening dress would probably not be shot until she actually opened fire, and maybe not even then: The cops just wouldn't quite believe it possible, and inhibitions are strong. A white Hells Angel would run a high risk, because cops expect violence from bikers.

In short, cops are more likely to be keyed up to shoot when dealing with people who, in their experience, are more likely to be dangerous.

The fact is that much more violent crime occurs in black regions, committed by blacks, than in white neighborhoods and committed by whites. You can explain this according to your politics, but it is nonetheless true. Cops know it. They deal in reality, not political correctness, and have to for survival. They--black cops, white cops, male or female--are visibly more cautious, edgier, in Anacostia than in Bethesda. To get shot in Bethesda, you'd probably have to do it yourself. Downtown, you get volunteers.

But it generally isn't a matter of unjustified racial discrimination. This is a point hard to convey in a society that is accustomed to seeking racial motives in preference to all others. Still, watch a black cop in Washington dealing with black drug dealers in an alley. The body language is tense. He watches his back and his hand stays close to the gun. Is he a racist against his own race? No. He's a cop, and he knows that drug dealers can be dangerous.

Racial tension is regularly encouraged by a default insistence by the media on racially inflammatory coverage. Yes, racist cops exist. Some racist cops behave racistically (if that's a word), and such behavior should not be permitted. But racist motives should be demonstrated before being reported, not just assumed. They are is assumed.

The media, whether they are conscious of it or not, have a racial agenda. Note that the headlines invariably say, "Black Man Shot By White Cops." They never say, "White Man Robbed By Black Youths" or "White Woman Assaulted By Black Man."

Having dealt with a lot of publications, I know the pattern. If I mention that a criminal is black, an editor calls and says, "But, Fred, what does race have to do with it? It's irrelevant." The same paper will stress the racial angle hard when the miscreant is white and the victim black.

I don't know what happened in the Diallo shooting. The jurors, four of them black, acquitted, and presumably had reason for doing so. I know that professional blacks, the Al Sharptons and Jesse Jacksons, will use the case to intensify racial hostility. And I know that the media will help relentlessly them.

We don't need more racial antagonism.

Buy Fred's New Collection of Sedition and Outrage! Curmudgeing Through Paradise What the critics are saying "Despicable. Without redeeming features": New York Preview of Books "Fred be discriminate!": Al Sharpton "Fred--that ugh! man--is the ideological equivalent of the Hillside Strangler": The American Feminist "Fred deserves his own entry in the DSM V": Psychology Today Note: If emailing, do not remove the slashes that appear in the subject line as otherwise, to avoid spam, your email will be heartlessly auto-deleted. Other Note: I try to read all letters, but simply cannot respond to hundreds of emails. Neither rudeness nor delusional self-importance is involved. Just can't do it. My apologies. Web FOE See? You are not alone. Which may or may not be a good thing. At any rate, there are other twisted, brain-fried wackos out there who have too much time on their hands and read this stuff, probably while cleaning their guns. But don't worry. This site wraps its IP packets in plain brown envelopes marked "Kinky Books" so your neighbors won't know. Anyway, to the extent that counters mean any thing, which isn't much of an extent, this sucker gives the number of columns read, not counting subscribers, since Monday, October 8, 2002. Whoopee-do. More or less. Nekkid in Austin Buy Fred's new reprehensible book, Nekkid In Austin! Barnes and Noble has the beast. Another collection of outrages, irresponsible ravings, and curmudgeonry from Fred On Everything and some innocent magazines that foolishly published him. Put Fred Reed in the search at thingy at B&N and the book will pop up like mushrooms on a decaying stump. Tell everyone you came to the site by mistake while searching for articles on cannibalism. Your childhood made you do it. We're all victims nowadays. The Great Possum-Squashing and Beer Storm of 1962 Stock up. Christmas will eventually come again, if it isn't outlawed. Possum-Squashing is a better present than an ugly tie. At least as good anyway. Terms of Use | | About Fred | Subscribe | Unsubscribe ©Fred Reed www.FredOnEverything.net Site designed by Emily Wolfer edesign@healthyspiritllc.com